Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Option 2
T2 Turbo (24MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer Z15 (525KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.065/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z15 (525KH/s) | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | Z15 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 525 KH/s | 24 MH/s Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2780W | 0W Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 5.30 J/KH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 66.7 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $15.34 Best | $0.86 | Antminer Z15 (525KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $460.30 Best | $25.80 | Antminer Z15 (525KH/s) |
| Price | $4,576.50 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 9.8 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 245 x 290 x 132 mm | 150 x 400 x 180 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 18000 g | 7500 g Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
T2 Turbo (24MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T2 Turbo (24MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 24 MH/s compared to Antminer Z15 (525KH/s)'s 525 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
