Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) vs BK-N+ (40KH/s)
Detailed side-by-side comparison of ASIC miners
Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s)
BK-N+ (40KH/s)
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) | BK-N+ (40KH/s) |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | |
| Model | X9 | BK |
| Hashrate | 1 MH/s | 40 KH/s |
| Power Consumption | 2472W | 120W |
| Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Price | $5,429.00 | Contact Us |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) or BK-N+ (40KH/s)?
Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1 MH/s compared to BK-N+ (40KH/s)'s 40 KH/s.
Is Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) more efficient than BK-N+ (40KH/s)?
Yes, Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) is more energy efficient based on its power-to-hashrate ratio.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.